English English (Canada) Español (Colombia) Deutsch Español Français English (UK) Italiano Português Русский English (US)

Comments

  1. Bronha Brousey

    Now that nobody remembers her...let's release some nudes so that people may recall who the fuck she is lol

    Reply
    1. goldfish

      It's definitely real. I know "anyone can claim anything" on the internet, but I'm a photographer, and I can tell you that these definitely look like real outtakes from the shoot. She was definitely nude for the original photos, but I'm sure there was an agreement that the photos would be cropped and that whatever was published would be non-explicit. But somehow these leaked. They're real. It's as simple as that.

      Reply
      1. Baby got backhanded

        Completely accurate. This was an uncropped version of an original that ESPN used in their 2012 The Body issue.

        Reply
      2. ujoh

        A lot of the time for these shoots they wear patches to cover nipples and their pussy, so it's surprising that for the outtakes she didn't and was fully nude. Amazing these haven't leaked before.

        Reply
      3. JustCametoFap

        You know they're not actually naked during these shoots, right? They have coverings specifically for this. Why even risk these photos getting out?

        Reply
        1. goldfish

          You can tell they're real due to the high resolution of the photo, the continuity of the skin texture, and the general optical consistency - these are not fake.

          Reply
    2. HOLYYY

      It can't be fake. The pic is WAY too high a resolution for someone to convincingly fake it that well. That photo is 100% genuine.

      Reply
  2. She likes the D

    That tattoo is really badly done and her pussy isn't very well shaved, looks like it could scratch a guy's dick or something. That said, those are nice tits and a very nice pussy!

    Reply
  3. Zippo

    Oh, these several years old photos, thanks for posting them! Such a service!

    Enjoy the click I just gave you, you cunts.

    Reply
    1. OMG-HES-A-RETARD

      You must be a retard .... did you notice her clit in the ESPN shoot back in 2012? No. Because it only leaked now.

      You cunt.

      Reply
  4. Snipes

    Not fake you dumb cunts zoom in you can see every crease and hair follicle on her body this is pre edited for release fuck people are stupid!

    Reply
      1. Snipes

        JustCametoFap The original was cropped you dumb cunt I am saying if the added pussy wasn't real it would be low Rez and photoshopped...you can clearly see it all matches.

        Reply
  5. Reaperman8807

    For those claiming the pics are fake, they are from an ESPN magazine back in 2012. There are even behind-the-scenes pics if you search for her posing for those pics. They are 100% REAL.

    Reply
  6. Zippo

    ..okay, so how did someone photoshop my little nub masquerading as a dick onto her body...guess that's why the boys in my hood affectionately call it a ditty......

    Reply
    1. YouKnowImRight

      Her crotch wasn't part of the shot. Do you realize that is an actual picture they used and just cropped?

      Reply
  7. Owen

    These are real, they are original and not air-brushed! Damn, I wonder who finally leaked them from the Sports Illustrated Body Magazine shoot.

    Reply
  8. FitGirlz

    The original picture stopped at the tattoo and offered much less zoom, but comparing both, this looks like a non-shopped version of the full picture (which would have her pussy in it), and it does have some details that make me think this may be legit. Could be a leak from the photoshoot?

    Reply
  9. Hmmm

    Gotta say--these don't look fake. They're hi-res, and there aren't any obvious signs of Photoshopping. Also think it's unlikely that someone faking Rousey would use such a non-conventional vagina.

    Also also, y'all might have missed that there are two topless photos there too--both of which look legit.

    Reply
    1. Reality Check

      >>Also think it’s unlikely that someone faking Rousey would use such a non-conventional vagina.

      Not sure if I understand this comment, would you be willing to elaborate just a bit? What is non-conventional about her vagina? Just curious. Thanks in advance for any reply.

      Reply
  10. No

    Not only does the pussy picture look legit but the other 2 photos look like new angles of the photoshoot too. I'm saying real leaks.

    Reply
  11. CK

    Why did it take 5 years for these to leak if they are, in fact, real and legit? I can't find anything online even remotely close to these nude images. They sure kept the goodies under wraps, didn't they? . . . Until now, that is. Good for us, at least

    Reply
    1. wawee

      Probably because her career is dead now. She was able to get a few movies out of her fame. We had to pretend for a minute she could take on men and beat them to appease the bandwagon feminist fans. Now that she's lost 2x in a row her career is done. So now she needs to leak these to get some attention back.

      Reply
    2. Reality Check

      >>Why did it take 5 years for these to leak if they are, in fact, real and legit?

      It's a great question, here is my guess.
      5 years ago she was in the prime of her fight career and was the reigning world champion...with sponsorship deals and huge endorsements.

      With the major recent losses in her MMA career and possible looming retirement...it is entirely possible that someone leaked these with her blessings, to attempt to stay active and relevant in any way possible. I am sure she realizes that in MMA fame fades very fast... I don't know if you are an MMA fan, but 10 years ago all everyone talked about in MMA was Chuck Liddell, Tito Ortiz, Ken Shamrock, Randy Couture...now, there is literally a new young generation of fans who have no idea who those guys are (when is the last time they have even been mentioned) and they have quickly faded into obscurity.

      Reply
  12. DemiGod410

    100 percent real guys, some hero at ESPN editing leaked these clear, that's really her pussy, and her nipple is exposed in the second pic, these are the non-shopped, non-airbrushed, unedited pics from the shoot!!!

    Reply
  13. Friend of a friend of RR

    She looks like she has a tight pussy! I bet she sure can grip a man's cock from the looks of her pussy! It's hard to say for sure without having a spread position view.

    Reply
  14. Imgreedy

    More please dear lord.. Please ask and you shall receive. I'm sorry if this is immature but the joy this brought when I saw this was like the joy of winning the lotto.

    Reply
  15. Patrick

    This is not difficult to figure out, guys. Her MMA career is in the tank. A cooch pic is an easy way to get people talking about her again. If she doesn't get the mileage she wants out of this, expect a sex tape by this time next year.

    Reply
  16. Alex Lear

    These aren't even leaks; they were printed in the magazine. Why do people think they're leaked? They've been on the internet for years.

    Reply
  17. Nick

    Usually they wear stick-on underwear to cover the genitals so you don't have to worry about things like this. Surprised she didn't wear any.

    Reply
  18. Jack

    These are real, not simply because the first one looks real but because the other two are unreleased photos from the original photoshoot.

    If you go back and look at the originals, the second and third pictures from this post are not included.

    Now unless you believe that the faker actually created those two photos from nothing (hyper-realistic paintings, CGI?) then there's no reason to argue about them being legit leaks.

    Reply
  19. Mike M

    I am an Adobe certified expert and if the first image is fake, it's a pretty good one. However, there is definitely a possibility that it is a fake. I could create something just as authentic looking in about 20 minutes if I had the original. I hate to say it, but it's most likely that she is wearing flesh tape over her vagina in the original and someone photoshopped just that part. However, I believe the second two are probably real. You can find a BTS image of Jamie Anderson's ESPN body shoot that clearly shows her bare areola, so it's not out of the realm of possibility that Ronda would not be covered. I'm still really hoping they are all real.

    Reply
  20. Ademir

    I'm a fan of her as a fighter. Now as a woman (what a beautiful little pussy... makes me want to lick, bite, eat... delicious!).

    Reply
  21. AJ

    I'm no expert on shopping at all, but I zoomed in, IT'S 100% FAKE

    you can see when fully zoomed the pixelation is different on the pussy compared to the rest of the pic

    took me 10 seconds to see it. So why has nobody else made this same comment??

    The pixelation for the pussy to the rest of the pic is 100% different

    Reply
  22. Robert Inonanob

    The area around her pussy is clear of any sign of photoshopping. I gamma adjusted the hell out of it and examined it closely. AJ is wrong, there is no difference in pixel depth. You cannot save an image with 2 different pixel depths in the first place. The depth of the pixels is applied across the entire image.

    That said, there is some questionable blurriness and pixel ripping on her outer thighs at the very bottom of the image.

    I cannot say with absolute certainty that the image is a real outtake, but I cannot with absolute certainty say it is a fake either.

    What I can say is if this image is a fake, the artist is extremely talented and that is the best fake I have ever seen.

    Real or fake every time I look at those ripped thighs, pelvic mound and dangerously muscular pussy all I can think is that I would die a happy man if that thing latched onto me and crushed the life right out of me. :-)

    Reply
  23. Spankmaster

    Fake or not, it looks real enough for us all to fap over it, so why the fuck then must we go on with all this fucked up rigmarole about it not being real? I have my hand down the front of my pants right now to prove to you all just how much I care as I look at Rhonda's cunt. Stand back please, we have lift off...

    Reply
  24. GetALifeCuck

    This bitch doesn't even have a good body and you virgins are frothing at the mouth over it. Fucking pathetic. Reminds me of Aussy. Y'all just love fugly cunts with bodies like fridges. Sad.

    Reply

Leave a Reply